Public incident case study · Energy and utilities · Poland

Polish Energy Sector Attacks Case Study

Coordinated destructive attacks 29–30 Dec 2025 · expanded incident findings published Aug 2026

30+renewable-energy facilities targetedCERT Polska confirmed destructive cyber-attacks against more than 30 wind and photovoltaic facilities. Damage to RTUs and communications equipment caused loss of communication and remote-control capability between the facilities and distribution system operators, although electricity generation continued.
~500,000
customers served by the large CHP target
50,000
residents served by the second CHP target
100+
machines where destructive wiping was halted by EDR
2
combined heat and power plants targeted
Executive summary

Incident sequence

  1. Distributed renewable sites were deliberately damaged

    Attackers gained access to grid-connection networks serving wind and photovoltaic installations and targeted multiple classes of industrial equipment. Hitachi RTUs were loaded with corrupted firmware, Mikronika RTUs had system files deleted, protection relays were rendered unable to restart, HMIs were attacked, and Moxa serial-device servers were factory-reset and reconfigured to impede recovery. The resulting RTU damage removed communication and remote-control capability between affected facilities and distribution system operators, although electricity generation itself continued.

  2. EDR stopped destructive wiping at a major CHP plant

    The attacker had maintained long-term access to a large CHP environment, stolen credentials and operational information, and obtained privileged Active Directory access. On 29 December, DynoWiper was distributed through Group Policy to destroy data across the organisation. The executable reached more than 100 machines, but an EDR canary mechanism detected file modification at runtime and halted the destructive activity. Further attempts to wipe workstations, server disks, and RAID configurations were also unsuccessful, and customer heat supply was not disrupted.

  3. A private APN became a path into another CHP plant

    A parallel attack against a second CHP plant was initially mistaken for a contractor error. CERT Polska later reconstructed an attack path beginning at a compromised wind-farm network, passing through a cellular router into a distribution system operator’s private APN, and then through a WAGO PFC200 controller using default credentials into the CHP OT network. CERT described this as the first observed real-world cyberattack using a private APN to access an OT network. The configuration allowed arbitrary devices on the APN to communicate with one another; CERT found the same condition was common among surveyed Polish organisations and believed it was also widely used internationally.

  4. PLC manipulation interrupted cogeneration

    After approximately a week of OT reconnaissance, the attacker connected directly to Siemens S7-300, S7-1200, and S7-1500 PLCs. Plant personnel reported that the controllers were switched into STOP mode and password-protected against recovery. The resulting shutdown of a steam turbine and process-water treatment system interrupted cogeneration. Operators restored controller logic from backups quickly enough to prevent any interruption to customer heat or electricity supply.

Full incident chronology

Incident timeline

Incident chronology.

  1. Before 29 Dec 2025

    CHP access

    An attacker established long-term access to a major CHP environment

    The actor collected credentials and operational information and obtained privileged Active Directory access before attempting enterprise-wide destruction.

  2. Wiper deployment

    DynoWiper was distributed to more than 100 machines

    The malware was pushed through Group Policy as part of an attempt to destroy data across the first CHP organisation.

  3. Defensive interruption

    An EDR canary stopped the destructive execution

    Runtime file-modification detection halted DynoWiper, while subsequent workstation, server-disk, and RAID-wiping attempts also failed.

  4. 29–30 Dec 2025

    Renewable-site destruction

    Attackers damaged remote-control and protection equipment

    Corrupted firmware, deleted files, factory resets, and protection-relay damage removed communication and remote-control capability without stopping electricity generation.

  5. Before 30 Dec 2025

    Second CHP path

    A compromised wind-farm network exposed a private APN route

    CERT Polska reconstructed traversal through a cellular router and mutually reachable private APN devices to a WAGO controller using default credentials.

  6. PLC manipulation

    Siemens controllers were stopped and password-protected

    After OT reconnaissance, the attacker forced controllers into STOP mode, interrupting a steam turbine and process-water treatment system.

  7. Operational recovery

    Operators restored logic before customer supply was interrupted

    Backups enabled rapid controller recovery, preventing a corresponding loss of customer heat or electricity despite the cogeneration shutdown.

Lykos analysis

What organisations should learn.

Why this matters to executives and boards

The Polish campaign shows what coordinated cyber sabotage against a modern energy ecosystem can look like: multiple distributed renewable sites, enterprise systems, industrial controllers, telecommunications dependencies, and two CHP environments were targeted at the same time. The absence of a blackout should not be mistaken for lack of consequence. Attackers successfully destroyed industrial devices and interrupted a live cogeneration process, while defensive tooling, engineering margins, operator intervention, and recoverable configurations prevented much larger customer impact.

Readiness gaps and strengths visible in the public record

The investigation identified default credentials on RTUs, relays, HMIs, device servers, and a PLC; Internet-accessible VPN services without MFA at renewable sites; inadequate trust boundaries around a private APN; exposed administrative interfaces; long-lived adversary access; and unexplained operational disruption initially attributed to maintenance activity. At the same time, EDR controls stopped destructive malware across more than 100 systems and CHP operators recovered PLC logic from backups before customers lost service. The case supports treating private carrier networks as untrusted, preventing unnecessary device-to-device communication within private APNs, eliminating default credentials, enforcing MFA and segmentation, monitoring industrial-device changes, preserving controller logs during recovery, validating OT backups, and escalating unexplained process failures as potential cyber incidents. CERT treated the events as one coordinated campaign, but that campaign-level assessment should not be read as separate actor attribution for every individual activity.

How Lykos helps

Turn the lesson into tested capability.

Network segmentation

Test whether containment can isolate affected environments without causing avoidable operational harm.

Explore Tabletop Exercises

Not sure where to begin? Start with Capability Validation.

Public record

Sources

Public record reviewed 22 Aug 2026.

  1. Energy Sector Incident Report – 29 December 2025CERT Polska / NASK · 30 Jan 2026 · National csirt incident report
  2. Energy Sector Incident Report - 29 December 2025CERT Polska / NASK · 30 Jan 2026 · National csirt statement
  3. Cyber-attack on energy sector infrastructure in Poland: detailed CERT Polska report publishedPolish Ministry of Energy · 2 Feb 2026 · Government statement
  4. Poland Stops Cyber-attacks on Energy InfrastructureChancellery of the Prime Minister of Poland · 15 Jan 2026 · Government statement
  5. Follow-Up Analysis of the 29 December 2025 Energy Sector IncidentCERT Polska / NASK · 8 Aug 2026 · National csirt incident report
  6. Follow-Up Report of the December 2025 Energy Sector IncidentCERT Polska / NASK · 8 Aug 2026 · National csirt statement
  7. Russian Government Cyber Actors Targeting Networking Devices, Critical InfrastructureFederal Bureau of Investigation · 20 Aug 2025 · Government attribution
  8. Russian state-sponsored espionage group Static Tundra compromises unpatched end-of-life network devicesCisco Talos · 20 Aug 2025 · Threat intelligence report